I have often standing alone, are invited, especially in my fight against pseudo-science by Peter Duesberg and Thabo Mbeki, and has been gratifying, in fact, the recent UN humanitarian awards in relation to my position on this issue . I have always said openly that it is morally wrong to force HIV / AIDS infected partner to sleep with other people, knowing that the sexual act is likely the death of the innocent person. In 2001, a group of Catholic bishopsSouth Africa condemned the use of condoms for HIV / AIDS in Africa to fight. Bishop Michael Coleman said: "Their use is immoral and dangerous, and the promotion of condoms is wrong weapon in our fight against HIV / AIDS." He continued: "Condoms do not make a difference ... the country is full of condoms, but we have the highest rate of HIV / AIDS in the world." Again, this is pseudo-science masquerading as scientific fact. Dr. Halpenny been "apartThat condoms has nothing done to stop the spread of AIDS, "and unwittingly fall into the trap of propaganda of the Catholic Church in Africa to promote the policy to the neglect of the doctrine of Humanae Vitae. 'On this basis I M with scientific problem to be addressed first.
The WHO has recently ruled against a view of the Catholic Church, said: "These incorrect statements about condoms and HIV are dangerous when we are facing a global pandemic that has killed more than 20 million people, andcurrently affects at least 42 million. "The United Nations has recently also deeply by the propaganda of the Catholic Church to tell the people with HIV / AIDS affected countries do not use condoms because they are small holes in them that HIV can pass through the disturbed. The Church makes this claim in four continents despite a widespread scientific consensus that condoms are impermeable to HIV. A senior Vatican spokesman, the president of the Pontifical Council for the FamilyCardinal Alfonso Lopez Trujillo, supports the claims about permeable condoms, despite assurances by the World Health Organisation that they are wrong. Scientific research by a group including the U.S. National Institutes of Health and the WHO "... found intact condoms are essentially impermeable to particles the size of STD pathogens including the smallest set of condoms, sexually transmitted virus ... a barrier against extremely effective transmission of particles of similar size to those of the smallest STDVirus. "
Conflagration
Things are getting worse, has LWAK, near Lake Victoria, Gordon Wambie, director of HIV / AIDS in the region, said on record that the local priests tell the most populous region, "which are condoms with HIV / AIDS combined. " Gone in Kenya (where it is estimated that 20% of people have HIV), the Archbishop of Nairobi, Raphael Ndingi Nzeki the memo went on it, "the Catholic church condemns condoms for promoting promiscuity and the rise of HIV / AIDS in this country. He also repeated the assertionon permeability. So why the church authorities should lie open to scientific facts and try to spread false propaganda of the needy people and the sick from plague-stricken African country.
Fortunately, the times of Galileo (who proclaims the truth of the Copernican theory), where the saint is believed the highest authority in all matters of science, the lake behind us. Perceived to withstand the wrath of the Catholic Church says:the teaching of Humanae Vitae "are contained in the Word of written or handed on, and defined with a solemn verdict as a divinely revealed truth of God, whether by the pope when he speaks" ex cathedra ", or the college of bishops gathered in Council or infallibly proposed to believe the ordinary and universal Magisterium, "I am the intellectual argument to use" legitimate dissent "to challenge the canon of the respective Codes of Canon Law. And 'recognized by the Catholic ChurchChurch, which is justified as long as the opposition is against Humanae Vitae, and said with respect, and as long as the official teaching of the Church right next to the theologians veyed expressed doubt that this theological dissent can be classified as "legal ".
Conflagration
To be honest, he neither saw nor his successor, Blessed John XXIII, Paul VI, the focus of public dissent that occurred after the publication of the encyclical Humanae Vitae in July 1968. The majority of CatholicsProfessors to teach theology in North America and many other world government at the time denied by the teachings of Humanae Vitae and the opposition continues to this day.
The problems started when Pope Paul VI sought to clarify the Catholic Church, the ancient doctrine of artificial contraception, according to the Protestant church to reverse the ancient prohibition of contraception during the Lambeth Conference of 1930. Teaching regarding birth controland the prohibition of artificial contraception has been defined in theory, by the Council of Nicaea (Canon 1) in 325 AD. The Church's teaching that procreation is not an element of sexual intercourse without grave sin and violation of the sanctity of marriage, mostly by theologians like Augustine, we must remember that before his conversion to Christianity to be influenced away, was a young vigorous years lived with a woman who bore him a son. ThisTheologian, was also called a Manichean dualism worldview, which falls on it as an evil in contrast to the spirit.
There is no doubt that these experiences color his views on marriage and sexuality and play somewhere on the controversial death of HIV / AIDS in Africa. We should also remember that the Bible has to say as good as theologically about contraception itself. The closer you get to this is the story of Onan (Gen. 38: 1-11) is sentencedDeath to practice coitus interruptus, which refers to his refusal to have children of his deceased brother (as the Jewish law required) to practice a form of birth control.
Finally in 1964 Pope Paul VI established the Pontifical Commission on Population and birth control. The commission consists of two parts, placed one of 64 people from 15 other priests, and they met in 1964 and 1966. One of the priests was Pope John Paul II, then Cardinal Pole. Unfortunately, PopePaul VI, the Commission has only one mission, not on moral teachings regarding birth control, but to determine how the church has expanded its position in question, without reconsideration of the change in papal authority. In 1966, the Commission found that it was not possible to change this, without papal authority. He also explained that the church make the changes anyway, because it was the right thing to do! In fact, the laity voted 60-4 to change andClerics, 9-6 for the change. Of greater interest is the fact that the co-author of a report of Karol Wojtyla (now Pope John Paul II) states:
"If you explain it, that contraception is not evil in itself, then we should openly admit that the Holy Spirit was on the side of the Protestant churches in 1930. It must also indicate that recorded for half a century, the mind does not protect Pius XI, Pius XII, and much of the Catholic hierarchy from a veryserious mistake. "
In 1968, Pope Paul V1 issued the controversial encyclical Humanae Vitae, the protests of Catholics around the world. Register after the mass public dissent against the encyclical, said theologians faithful to the Magisterium of the Church, that the doctrine was true and infallible. I think I'm writing, saying that the Pope Paul VI ever, these lat ter right, yes, his spokesman theological, when the encyclical was released, Fernando Lambrushin guard, in particular, notes that the encyclical does not teach infallibly Ing Hans Küng, the renowned Swiss Catholic theologian, explains that a very credible argument could be made against a infallibity sis on the virtual unanimity with which the popes and bishops have always had over the centuries that contraception is bad, waiting. The late Father John Ford, SJ, (advisor of Pope Paul VI on the subject): In June 1978, this argument was supported by two moral theologiansand a layman, Professor Germain Grisez in the arts, "Contraception and the Infallibility of the Ordinary Magisterium" CLE justified. Hans Küng has also explained that it was not possible to solve the problem "in connection with contraception / condoms until you wish to resolve the problem of infallibility. We should remember that the Pope was infallible only in July 1870, in the same year, as the loss of the Papal States. Catholic historian Bernhard Hasler has in his book "How the Pope is infallible," thatmore than a millennium, the Vatican had the temporal power that had ensured their survival. With the loss of the Papal States, it seemed almost certain that a strong papacy would disappear, and Pope Pius IX issued a decree to consolidate the power of the Vatican.
However, millions of children go every night without bedding 'every night in Africa. When Dr. Halpenny can tell me where is the evidence for the "respect for life and human dignity" in this situation, I wouldcertainly feel. I would also ask whether, in fact, actually allow the proponents of this theory wrong that their partners are infected with HIV have sex with them, when those who were positive. It would certainly show little respect for life .. comment!. The other theological argument, if you could clone a soul is not truly empty, but it certainly means that the Church is to define the appropriate time teaching new textsin connection with the current situation, when God gives a soul to a body. But that can wait another day.
The influence of the Catholic Church on the plague HIV
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น